" My 250 is wearing 17/42 sprockets , "
____ Having never owned a Mach-I, I can't be positive of what gearing that model came with but, I think it was the same as the later-1965 '250Mark3' came with, which was 40/18t,, (so as to be able to obtain the top-speed of 110-MPH @ red-line).
__ The pre-1965 'Diana Mark III' models came with 43/18t, (and hadn't been able to claim the 110-MPH top-speed).
" I calculate that this should equate to 99 mph at 8500 rpm , seems like a good compromise "
____ The Monza came with 45/17t, for a relatively low sprocket-ratio of 2.65:1,
and the GT came with 45/18t -(2.5:1) gearing which was pretty-much right in between that of the Monza's & a Diana Mark-III's -(2.39:1),
and since your 42-17t -(2.47:1) sprocket-ratio is pretty-much the same as a GT's, then your gearing could indeed be considered as a good compromise between the Monza's & the Diana Mark-III's, sprocket-ratios, (especially since it's also a tad closer towards the very-high Mark-3/M.1 -[2.22:1] sprocket-ratio).
" rear tyre has a dia of 24 and a half inches or 76.979 inches circ. Are my maths somewhere near?. "
____ Well actually, your rear-wheel's 'diameter' is not quite exactly useful for calculating the most accurate figures... Rather, you ought to figure-in the wheel's 'radius'.
__ Have you somehow missed the related thread-posts which fairly well covered this topic-matter, posted just last month ? ...
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=564&start=10 DewCatTea-Bob wrote:If you're interested to know your wheel's actual radius, then simply dab a small wet-spot onto your rear-tire's tread (or insert a little-piece of chalk or crayon into it), and then let me know the distance measured between two spots transferred onto the ground -(smooth pavement), from your straight-line rolled wheel.
And with that distance-data, I'll then demonstrate how to use my-own formula for calculating speed @ RPM (or calculating RPM @ a given speed).
" Are my maths somewhere near?. "
____ Well without factoring-in the actual rolling radius of your rear-wheel, and we simply go-ahead & assume that your tire's running-circumference is really 77-inches...
Then to 'check' your results (of 99-MPH @ 8500-RPM), we take the number of inches in a mile (63360) and divide by the 77-inches, to get 822.86 rotations (of the wheel per mile), then multiply by the 99-MPH & your-particular overall gear-ratio of 5.98 -(60/24 x 30/31 x 42/17), then divide by 60 -(min. per hour), to thus then get a corresponding RPM of just 8115 !
__ But likely your math is off by more than just the 385-revs, as the (omitted) factor of 'tire-growth' would tend to lower the revs still further, (possibly up to as much as around 8%, depending on the tire's air-pressure).
So it could possibly be that your actual revs would be closer to 7500-RPM (near 99-MPH).
Fun-Cheers,
DCT-Bob