" Does any of you have a picture of the cable set up at or hear the valve on your bike you could E-mail to me ? "
____ It seems like somewhere in this forum I recall that there has already been posted a link (if not the actual picture), for that which you seek.
__The inner-cable goes through the tip-end of the lever & then through a small hole in one of the fins on the special-cover, where it's then clamped.
____ A good alternative for having a comp.release,
is to put the transmission into 1st-gear and roll backwards until ya feel the resistance of the compression, then you'll be at about the same desired-position as should be expected with the proper use of a comp.release! _ So from that point, you simply put it back into neutral & kick-thru .
This method is actually much easier for finding the optimum-position for the crankshaft-flywheel to be at, for then getting the best possible kick-over of the engine (through the very-next compression-stroke)!
I had to discover this method after I had installed a 100-thousandths over-size MC-piston -(which was 10.5:1 for a 250), in my first 350, which had no comp.release, (thus increasing the 'compression-ratio' to 13.5:1).
__ I'll admit that somebody who has developed an extra keen ability with the use of the compression-release, could possibly obtain a few degrees more of additional crankshaft-flywheel rotation, for slightly more advantage with the following kick-thru, but, that small extra difference is really not worth mentioning, (and I have only done so, so that nobody else will feel any need to make the point).
DUCATIly,
DCT-Bob
Compression release
Moderator: ajleone
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: Compression release
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Pacifc Northwet USA
Re: Compression release
Like Bob said, the inner cable is actually clamped thru a small hole in one of the fins. The outer sheath is what moves to press the lever down on the c/r.
Mine is all in pcs or I would take a pic for you.
I know I will take heat for it, but I am actually taking the c/r off of my 450. I got a new set of rocker covers off ebay and am putting a new set of levers on w/o the c/r. I am going to use the technique that Bob describes to find the proper kick-over. Personally I think the c/r spoils the look of the motor and it will be one less cable hanging off.
Mine is all in pcs or I would take a pic for you.
I know I will take heat for it, but I am actually taking the c/r off of my 450. I got a new set of rocker covers off ebay and am putting a new set of levers on w/o the c/r. I am going to use the technique that Bob describes to find the proper kick-over. Personally I think the c/r spoils the look of the motor and it will be one less cable hanging off.
1970 450 SCR
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: Compression release
" the inner cable is actually clamped thru a small hole in one of the fins. "
____ Ducati also made an egg-shaped bracket which could be used (in-place of a washer) on either of the two front cylinder-bolts. _ It's 3mm thick with two holes - one for the 10mm-bolt & one for the cable-clamp.
This allows more places for the cable-clamp to be located, since the lever-mechanism may screw-down to tighten-up & leave the lever-end facing towards other directions.
I've also seen the needed clamp-hole placed in the top (finned) fin of the head itself!
" I know I will take heat for it, but I am actually taking the c/r off of my 450. "
____ The actual-compression is very high with the extra mild-camshaft that's stock in springer-450s !
I highly suggest replacing the original-camshaft with a wilder cam! _ Preferably with the camshaft which was designed specially for the 450-springer Mark-3 -(non-'D').
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
____ Ducati also made an egg-shaped bracket which could be used (in-place of a washer) on either of the two front cylinder-bolts. _ It's 3mm thick with two holes - one for the 10mm-bolt & one for the cable-clamp.
This allows more places for the cable-clamp to be located, since the lever-mechanism may screw-down to tighten-up & leave the lever-end facing towards other directions.
I've also seen the needed clamp-hole placed in the top (finned) fin of the head itself!
" I know I will take heat for it, but I am actually taking the c/r off of my 450. "
____ The actual-compression is very high with the extra mild-camshaft that's stock in springer-450s !
I highly suggest replacing the original-camshaft with a wilder cam! _ Preferably with the camshaft which was designed specially for the 450-springer Mark-3 -(non-'D').
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Pacifc Northwet USA
Re: Compression release
DewCatTea-Bob wrote: I've also seen the needed clamp-hole placed in the top (finned) fin of the head itself!
Now that you mention it, that is the way mine was. Thru the top fin of the head.
DewCatTea-Bob wrote:I highly suggest replacing the original-camshaft with a wilder cam! _ (non-'D').
What would that do?
DewCatTea-Bob wrote: Preferably with the camshaft which was designed specially for the 450-springer Mark-3 -
Wasn't the Mark 3 cam the same as the SCR cam?
1970 450 SCR
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: Compression release
I highly suggest replacing the original-camshaft with a wilder cam!
" What would that do? "
____ Concerning the topic, it would make the 450-springer easier to kick-thru the compression-stroke!
And also, a wilder cam would let the 450 breath more satisfactory. _ (As the stock-450's '250-SCR' cam is way too mild for a big 430cc cylinder!)
" Wasn't the Mark 3 cam the same as the SCR cam? "
____ I assume that you actually meant to ask: wasn't the 450Mark-3 camshaft the same cam used for the 450Jupiter/SCR ?
The answer to that is 'yes', that's how both models came stock from the factory!
__ I'm unaware if Ducati ever designed a cam just for the 450SCR, however they did design one specifically for the 450Mark3 !
My understanding is that the Italian-gov reps would not allow for the added expense of producing a camshaft just for that one model. _ So all 450-springer models had to share a camshaft with an existing model, and I guess Ducati chose the wide-case 250SCR-cam for the job.
That's really too bad, that it had to be that way! _ Cuz the 450 is really choked-off with that mild-cam!
For anyone who really wanted the '450-cam', it could be special-ordered... Off the top of my head, I believe that the part-# for that "450-cam" was either '0615.29.010' or '0616.29.010' . _ (The other number was for the '450DESMO-cam'.)
__ I already touched on this subject once before, (with more details), in another thread -(I think the one concerning Winter-Projects), after fellow-member 'Thevin' mentioned that he had a 450SCR to work on. _ So please read that post and then ask any further questions.
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
" What would that do? "
____ Concerning the topic, it would make the 450-springer easier to kick-thru the compression-stroke!
And also, a wilder cam would let the 450 breath more satisfactory. _ (As the stock-450's '250-SCR' cam is way too mild for a big 430cc cylinder!)
" Wasn't the Mark 3 cam the same as the SCR cam? "
____ I assume that you actually meant to ask: wasn't the 450Mark-3 camshaft the same cam used for the 450Jupiter/SCR ?
The answer to that is 'yes', that's how both models came stock from the factory!
__ I'm unaware if Ducati ever designed a cam just for the 450SCR, however they did design one specifically for the 450Mark3 !
My understanding is that the Italian-gov reps would not allow for the added expense of producing a camshaft just for that one model. _ So all 450-springer models had to share a camshaft with an existing model, and I guess Ducati chose the wide-case 250SCR-cam for the job.
That's really too bad, that it had to be that way! _ Cuz the 450 is really choked-off with that mild-cam!
For anyone who really wanted the '450-cam', it could be special-ordered... Off the top of my head, I believe that the part-# for that "450-cam" was either '0615.29.010' or '0616.29.010' . _ (The other number was for the '450DESMO-cam'.)
__ I already touched on this subject once before, (with more details), in another thread -(I think the one concerning Winter-Projects), after fellow-member 'Thevin' mentioned that he had a 450SCR to work on. _ So please read that post and then ask any further questions.
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:00 am
- Location: Walworth, NY
Re: Compression release
Teckhardt,
Bob had mentioned that your 450 cam would work well in my 350. Let me know if you want to part with it.
Pete
Bob had mentioned that your 450 cam would work well in my 350. Let me know if you want to part with it.
Pete
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Pacifc Northwet USA
Re: Compression release
DewCatTea-Bob wrote:__ I already touched on this subject once before, (with more details), in another thread -(I think the one concerning Winter-Projects), after fellow-member 'Thevin' mentioned that he had a 450SCR to work on. _ So please read that post and then ask any further questions.
Don't know how I missed that thread. Good stuff there.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=20
1970 450 SCR
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Pacifc Northwet USA
Re: Compression release
Pete wrote:Teckhardt,
Bob had mentioned that your 450 cam would work well in my 350. Let me know if you want to part with it.
Pete
If I end up putting another cam in, I will sure let you know.
1970 450 SCR
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Re: Compression release
By Pete : ...
" Bob had mentioned that your 450 cam would work well in my 350. "
____ There were 3!,(maybe 4?) different camshafts which came stock in the various std.production 350-models, and only one of them was designed specifically for the 350 ! ...
__ The 350-Sebring came stock with the cam designed for the 250-Monza ! _ While that cam was a good middle-of-the-road design for a '250', it was really too mild for a 350.
Swapping the ('Violet') Monza-cam for the slightly wilder '250SCR-cam', would be a step in the right direction for that 350 -(which was stock with the 'Monza-cam')! _ However, the difference in performance is really not noticeably improved enough to make it worth-while to do such a cam-swap-job.
__ Most wide-case 350s came with the (G&W) '250F1-cam' - a cam that's so wild for a 250, that it's still quite wild even in a 350 ! _ Cams with such wild valve-timing do not work well with mufflers! _ So while that 'Green&White' cam is fine for racing, it really hurts a 350 for street-legal riding ! _ Thus swapping that cam for the w-c '250SCR-cam' would make a worth-while camshaft swap-job ! _ However you might not notice any big difference unless you do a high-gear roll-on against any stock wide-case 350, before & after, (as I have done several times!), to then witness the overall improved acceleration !
__ I have tried almost every std.production camshaft in almost every 250/350/450 model ! ... And so I know that a camshaft-swap between a (non-Sebring)/WideCase-350 & a 450-springer -(which were stock with the 250SCR-cam) will benefit the 450 even more than it benefits the 350 !
__ In my opinion, the '250Mach1-cam' is the best-choice overall for any otherwise stock std.production 350 ! _ Unfortunately, I don't have a great deal of experience with the fairly rare REAL '350-cam', as I only ever had just two of them. - The ('Green' ?) '350-cam' was originally designed for the 350Mark-3 and it's cam-lobes are about the average between the 'Mach1-cam' & the 'F1-cam'. _ Exactly which models of 350s actually came with the real '350-cam' has always been a bit of a mystery to me cuz the paint that's placed on the end of the shaft always seems to have come-off, and it's really not possible to tell one from a 'F1-cam' by just looking at it (since they're both so very similar!). _ I got mine from the early -(pre-'68 wide-case) 350-Scrambler -(which no 350SCR ever got a cam-design of it's very-own). _ Those '67 350SCRs came with 4-pole alternators and a lighter frame with squarish flat-U shaped fenders & the narrow-case SCR-gastank! - A fairly rare model ! _ Anyone else got one?
__ I stated that there are three different camshafts for the various 350 models because that's what I KNOW were imported into the U.S., and I indicated that there might be a 4th cam (for 350s) because, the Haynes workshop-manual (wrongly!) states that there were (only) two cams for all 350 models... Besides the well-known Green&White cam, Haynes also claims that some 350s used the 'White' (250SCR) camshaft.
I have NEVER found that milder cam in any stock 350 ! _ So I must assume that some of the Brit.versions came with that cam. _ If so, that makes real good-sense ! _ And I'm sure that Ducati had favored that choice for their 350SCRs, since that same 'White' camshaft was stock for all other wide-case SCRambler-models of any size !
As for why it seems that all the 350SCRs imported into the U.S. came with the wild cams, I can only point my finger at Berliner as the reason for that stupid choice for any 'Scrambler' type model ! _ As back in those days, your average cyclist simply assumed that wilder-cams directly-translated to 'Go Faster!' .
But in fact, those wild cams simply killed the (wide-case) 350's overall power (since they ran with a muffler) !
__ BTW, I got my idea of installing the 250SCR (White-cam) into 350s long before the Haynes book became available ! _ And I was surprised (somewhat delightfully) when I first read that info.
____ Well I've wondered off-track again as I'm apt to do, so I'll end this post now.
__ I hope to compile & post the specs of all the various std.production camshafts of every DUKE-model, some day soon.
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
" Bob had mentioned that your 450 cam would work well in my 350. "
____ There were 3!,(maybe 4?) different camshafts which came stock in the various std.production 350-models, and only one of them was designed specifically for the 350 ! ...
__ The 350-Sebring came stock with the cam designed for the 250-Monza ! _ While that cam was a good middle-of-the-road design for a '250', it was really too mild for a 350.
Swapping the ('Violet') Monza-cam for the slightly wilder '250SCR-cam', would be a step in the right direction for that 350 -(which was stock with the 'Monza-cam')! _ However, the difference in performance is really not noticeably improved enough to make it worth-while to do such a cam-swap-job.
__ Most wide-case 350s came with the (G&W) '250F1-cam' - a cam that's so wild for a 250, that it's still quite wild even in a 350 ! _ Cams with such wild valve-timing do not work well with mufflers! _ So while that 'Green&White' cam is fine for racing, it really hurts a 350 for street-legal riding ! _ Thus swapping that cam for the w-c '250SCR-cam' would make a worth-while camshaft swap-job ! _ However you might not notice any big difference unless you do a high-gear roll-on against any stock wide-case 350, before & after, (as I have done several times!), to then witness the overall improved acceleration !
__ I have tried almost every std.production camshaft in almost every 250/350/450 model ! ... And so I know that a camshaft-swap between a (non-Sebring)/WideCase-350 & a 450-springer -(which were stock with the 250SCR-cam) will benefit the 450 even more than it benefits the 350 !
__ In my opinion, the '250Mach1-cam' is the best-choice overall for any otherwise stock std.production 350 ! _ Unfortunately, I don't have a great deal of experience with the fairly rare REAL '350-cam', as I only ever had just two of them. - The ('Green' ?) '350-cam' was originally designed for the 350Mark-3 and it's cam-lobes are about the average between the 'Mach1-cam' & the 'F1-cam'. _ Exactly which models of 350s actually came with the real '350-cam' has always been a bit of a mystery to me cuz the paint that's placed on the end of the shaft always seems to have come-off, and it's really not possible to tell one from a 'F1-cam' by just looking at it (since they're both so very similar!). _ I got mine from the early -(pre-'68 wide-case) 350-Scrambler -(which no 350SCR ever got a cam-design of it's very-own). _ Those '67 350SCRs came with 4-pole alternators and a lighter frame with squarish flat-U shaped fenders & the narrow-case SCR-gastank! - A fairly rare model ! _ Anyone else got one?
__ I stated that there are three different camshafts for the various 350 models because that's what I KNOW were imported into the U.S., and I indicated that there might be a 4th cam (for 350s) because, the Haynes workshop-manual (wrongly!) states that there were (only) two cams for all 350 models... Besides the well-known Green&White cam, Haynes also claims that some 350s used the 'White' (250SCR) camshaft.
I have NEVER found that milder cam in any stock 350 ! _ So I must assume that some of the Brit.versions came with that cam. _ If so, that makes real good-sense ! _ And I'm sure that Ducati had favored that choice for their 350SCRs, since that same 'White' camshaft was stock for all other wide-case SCRambler-models of any size !
As for why it seems that all the 350SCRs imported into the U.S. came with the wild cams, I can only point my finger at Berliner as the reason for that stupid choice for any 'Scrambler' type model ! _ As back in those days, your average cyclist simply assumed that wilder-cams directly-translated to 'Go Faster!' .
But in fact, those wild cams simply killed the (wide-case) 350's overall power (since they ran with a muffler) !
__ BTW, I got my idea of installing the 250SCR (White-cam) into 350s long before the Haynes book became available ! _ And I was surprised (somewhat delightfully) when I first read that info.
____ Well I've wondered off-track again as I'm apt to do, so I'll end this post now.
__ I hope to compile & post the specs of all the various std.production camshafts of every DUKE-model, some day soon.
DUKE-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:25 pm
- Location: Pacifc Northwet USA
Re: Compression release
DewCatTea-Bob wrote:____ Well I've wondered off-track again as I'm apt to do, so I'll end this post now.
Bob:
As far as I am concerned, you can wander off topic as much as you want. You keep giving us all great info. I just wish there was a way to we could database it all.
1970 450 SCR
Return to “Ducati Singles Main Discussions (& How to Join)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests