Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Ducati single cylinder motorcycle questions and discussions, all models. Ducati single cylinder motorcycle-related content only! Email subscription available.
Moderator: Morpheus

Moderator: ajleone

Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:53 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Samurai » Sun May 21, 2017 10:29 am

Hi, can anyone tell me what the spec is for the cam bearings in a 175 narrowcase?

I know that they are a 6202 size, but am unsure if they need to be a C3 or deep groove etc.?

Any advice from the Wise Ones in here would be much appreciated :)

ducwiz
Posts: 604
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 12:52 pm
Location: near Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby ducwiz » Sun May 21, 2017 11:15 am

The parts list says "RIV 02A", which is equivalent to a std. 6202. According to a cross reference list from FAQ, the C3 type must be named RIV 02A/053.

cheers Hans

Rick
Posts: 340
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Northern Plains, USA

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Rick » Sun May 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Bearing manufacturers are really good about publishing technical specs- if you do a search you'll find lots of info. The standard bearing clearance, in the US anyway, is usually called a 'CN', with a C2 being lower clearance and C3 being a higher clearance- just the clearance between the races and the balls, not the 'fit' of races, that's another spec.
But, the clearances are small, and overlap. For a 15mm shaft the CN clearance is 3-18 micrometers and C3 is 11-25 micrometers. My brain still defaults to inches, and a micrometer is 0.00003937", so it's a very small number- less than 0.0003" difference at the max. Plus, with the overlap, a loose CN has more clearance than a tight C3.
If the fit of the shaft on the inner race or the outer race in the head are really loose than I'd use a CN- not much need to worry about clearance. Usually the fit of the shaft and the housing bore are really tight, an interference or shrink fit- than I'd use the looser C3 to avoid too much preload.
I go with too loose over too tight- maybe a little noisy, but a tight bearing overheats and compounds the problem.
Rick

Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:53 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Samurai » Sun May 21, 2017 6:19 pm

ducwiz wrote:The parts list says "RIV 02A", which is equivalent to a std. 6202. According to a cross reference list from FAQ, the C3 type must be named RIV 02A/053.

cheers Hans

Hans, you're a star old son, many thanks :D

Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:53 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Samurai » Sun May 21, 2017 6:21 pm

Rick wrote:Bearing manufacturers are really good about publishing technical specs- if you do a search you'll find lots of info. The standard bearing clearance, in the US anyway, is usually called a 'CN', with a C2 being lower clearance and C3 being a higher clearance- just the clearance between the races and the balls, not the 'fit' of races, that's another spec.
But, the clearances are small, and overlap. For a 15mm shaft the CN clearance is 3-18 micrometers and C3 is 11-25 micrometers. My brain still defaults to inches, and a micrometer is 0.00003937", so it's a very small number- less than 0.0003" difference at the max. Plus, with the overlap, a loose CN has more clearance than a tight C3.
If the fit of the shaft on the inner race or the outer race in the head are really loose than I'd use a CN- not much need to worry about clearance. Usually the fit of the shaft and the housing bore are really tight, an interference or shrink fit- than I'd use the looser C3 to avoid too much preload.
I go with too loose over too tight- maybe a little noisy, but a tight bearing overheats and compounds the problem.
Rick

Wow, loads of info! Many thanks for the education Rick :D

Jordan
Posts: 1389
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:29 am

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Jordan » Sun May 21, 2017 10:48 pm

Rick wrote:If the fit of the shaft on the inner race or the outer race in the head are really loose than I'd use a CN- not much need to worry about clearance. Usually the fit of the shaft and the housing bore are really tight, an interference or shrink fit- than I'd use the looser C3 to avoid too much preload.
I go with too loose over too tight- maybe a little noisy, but a tight bearing overheats and compounds the problem.
Rick


Sometimes a C3 bearing is specified for a rebuilt assembly, even if the original bearing was not.
I took this to mean that a used machine benefits from some extra clearance, due to possible slight warpage of cast housings, and difficulty of getting things clinically clean in the average workshop.

Samurai
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:53 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Samurai » Mon May 22, 2017 6:35 am

Good point.

Seeing as most of the bearings that I've bought for the bottom end from Lacey Ducati have been C3s this makes sense.

That, together with the high speed of rotation and possibility of heat build up if there is any chance of inadvertant preloading due to wear, leads me to think I'll put some C3 spec ones in there to be in the safe side.

Thanks for all the advice, it's much appreciated all :D

ducwiz
Posts: 604
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 12:52 pm
Location: near Frankfurt, Germany

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby ducwiz » Mon May 22, 2017 6:26 pm

Samurai wrote:
ducwiz wrote:The parts list says "RIV 02A", which is equivalent to a std. 6202. According to a cross reference list from FAQ, the C3 type must be named RIV 02A/053.

cheers Hans

Hans, you're a star old son, many thanks :D



Sorry, that was a "freudian" - FAG of course ! The list is here: http://www.fag-ina.at/explorer/download/waelzlager/Waelzlagervergleichsliste.pdf
Btw, I even used C4 grade more than once, for the w/c mainshaft bearing, RH side (parts catalog no. 75120.1747, bearing RIV 01A). In many engines I worked on, it's bore was too tight, no free play remained after the new C3 bearing was pressed in - one could still "feel" the balls when the bearing's inner race was rotated with a finger in it.

..

Jordan
Posts: 1389
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:29 am

Re: Narrowcase Spring head Cam Bearing

Postby Jordan » Mon May 22, 2017 10:35 pm

ducwiz wrote: In many engines I worked on, it's bore was too tight, no free play remained after the new C3 bearing was pressed in - one could still "feel" the balls when the bearing's inner race was rotated with a finger in it.


Thanks ducwiz. It's not something I've noticed, but I'll be checking from now on.


Return to “Ducati Singles Main Discussions (& How to Join)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests