Poor guide support on ported head.
Moderator: ajleone
-
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:01 am
- Location: Bromley Kent UK.
Poor guide support on ported head.
My mark3 head was ported for racing at some time, Good for breathing , the motor shoots up to 10000 in a blink, however this is not much use as its bad for the big end and i don't ride that hard anyway.the lack of the guide boss is known to provoke guide movement. Has anyone had a boss welded back in ? is there another solution?.
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:29 am
Re: Poor guide support on ported head.
Yes, I have another solution: Use a desmo head without valve springs, or with lighter springs.
That relieves the guides of much of the pressure that would act on them.
Also easier on everything in the valve-driving train - cams, rockers, valve stems, shims, spindles, bushes, gears.
That's my theory, anyway!
Jordan
That relieves the guides of much of the pressure that would act on them.
Also easier on everything in the valve-driving train - cams, rockers, valve stems, shims, spindles, bushes, gears.
That's my theory, anyway!
Jordan
-
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am
- Location: Near SE side of Lake Michigan
Good V.guide-support vs. Ported-intake.
By: Bevel bob...
" the lack of the guide boss is known to provoke guide movement. "
____ Of-course that's fairly true and stands to reason, as there's even less material left-behind to help support & hold-tight the v.guide, after Ducati's largest (std.production)*intake-port has been further 'ported' -(enlarged).
__ * Ducati had three obviously different intake-port type/sizes in their std.production 250/350 cyl.heads... 26.5mm for the Monza/GT/Sebring; 28.5mm for the 250-Scr./Motocross/Mark-III; 29.5mm for the 250M1/M3 & most-all wc-350 models. _ The 26.5-port is the only port-type which has an obviously obtrusive/(somewhat obstructive) v.guide support-boss, while the other two port-types leave the bare v.guide 'sticking-out' from the intake-port's port-wall/ceiling,, although later model wide-case heads did have their port-roof/ceiling's height notably reduced near the v.guide area, but it's relatively too settle to be considered as a clearly-obvious v.guide "boss" (like the Monza-port more certainly has).
" Has anyone had a boss welded back in ? "
____ Well probably-not actually merely-just a "boss" for the v.guide only...
What others (who think that port-SHAPE makes a worthwhile-difference, [I-myself don't] ), have done, is have pretty-much the ENTIRE intake port-way welded-up within, (not just the guide-support area),, and then bore-out a new intake-port (with an expected superior shaped air-flow path-way, for improved 'breathing', [and hopefully also still sufficient v.guide-support] ).
But rather than go to such an extravagant expense (for relatively next to no really useful beneficial-return), it would serve you better to simply trade your 'ported' cyl.head (for another unmodified one), to someone-else who would prefer your already ported-out cyl.head, (likely for their intended race-engine).
" is there another solution?. "
____ Yes... What I did, (way-back when I was thinking that bigger-is-better), was after porting-out the intake-port too large (to leave much meat left for supporting a stock-type v.guide), I then next threaded the v.guide-hole, and also threaded a replacement-v.guide, so that then the v.guide would be 'threaded-in' rather than merely 'pressed-in'.
The special-v.guide was turned on a lathe and made to have it's threads somewhat over-sized (compared to std.threaded-fittings), so that the cyl.head needed to be heated-up in order to get the v.guide fully screwed-down into place. _ And besides that extra measure, a tiny-hole also had to be drilled-through the (pre-tightened down) threads (of both head & guide 's top 2-threads), so that a short pin/peg could then be pressed-through in-between, so as to then lock-in the v.guide (to the head, to KEEP it fully threaded-in).
All this extra added-work done just to make-SURE that the v.guide REMAINS stayed-put, (as well as keep the guide solidly positioned so it couldn't ever be wobbled-loose, [like a merely pressed-in std.guide eventually becomes], of-course).
___ However to the dismay of the racer-types among us, it's been my-own experience that such enlarged intake-port modifications are not really worth the relatively rather small resulted-gains in power-production,, since rider-weight differences of just-merely 5 to 10 pounds can make a roughly equal/cancelling difference in acceleration. _ (So-thus it's probably easier/cheaper to just loose 10-lbs some way.)
Duke-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
" the lack of the guide boss is known to provoke guide movement. "
____ Of-course that's fairly true and stands to reason, as there's even less material left-behind to help support & hold-tight the v.guide, after Ducati's largest (std.production)*intake-port has been further 'ported' -(enlarged).
__ * Ducati had three obviously different intake-port type/sizes in their std.production 250/350 cyl.heads... 26.5mm for the Monza/GT/Sebring; 28.5mm for the 250-Scr./Motocross/Mark-III; 29.5mm for the 250M1/M3 & most-all wc-350 models. _ The 26.5-port is the only port-type which has an obviously obtrusive/(somewhat obstructive) v.guide support-boss, while the other two port-types leave the bare v.guide 'sticking-out' from the intake-port's port-wall/ceiling,, although later model wide-case heads did have their port-roof/ceiling's height notably reduced near the v.guide area, but it's relatively too settle to be considered as a clearly-obvious v.guide "boss" (like the Monza-port more certainly has).
" Has anyone had a boss welded back in ? "
____ Well probably-not actually merely-just a "boss" for the v.guide only...
What others (who think that port-SHAPE makes a worthwhile-difference, [I-myself don't] ), have done, is have pretty-much the ENTIRE intake port-way welded-up within, (not just the guide-support area),, and then bore-out a new intake-port (with an expected superior shaped air-flow path-way, for improved 'breathing', [and hopefully also still sufficient v.guide-support] ).
But rather than go to such an extravagant expense (for relatively next to no really useful beneficial-return), it would serve you better to simply trade your 'ported' cyl.head (for another unmodified one), to someone-else who would prefer your already ported-out cyl.head, (likely for their intended race-engine).
" is there another solution?. "
____ Yes... What I did, (way-back when I was thinking that bigger-is-better), was after porting-out the intake-port too large (to leave much meat left for supporting a stock-type v.guide), I then next threaded the v.guide-hole, and also threaded a replacement-v.guide, so that then the v.guide would be 'threaded-in' rather than merely 'pressed-in'.
The special-v.guide was turned on a lathe and made to have it's threads somewhat over-sized (compared to std.threaded-fittings), so that the cyl.head needed to be heated-up in order to get the v.guide fully screwed-down into place. _ And besides that extra measure, a tiny-hole also had to be drilled-through the (pre-tightened down) threads (of both head & guide 's top 2-threads), so that a short pin/peg could then be pressed-through in-between, so as to then lock-in the v.guide (to the head, to KEEP it fully threaded-in).
All this extra added-work done just to make-SURE that the v.guide REMAINS stayed-put, (as well as keep the guide solidly positioned so it couldn't ever be wobbled-loose, [like a merely pressed-in std.guide eventually becomes], of-course).
___ However to the dismay of the racer-types among us, it's been my-own experience that such enlarged intake-port modifications are not really worth the relatively rather small resulted-gains in power-production,, since rider-weight differences of just-merely 5 to 10 pounds can make a roughly equal/cancelling difference in acceleration. _ (So-thus it's probably easier/cheaper to just loose 10-lbs some way.)
Duke-Cheers,
DCT-Bob
PLEASE NOTE... If this-post is not-yet signed-off with '-Bob', then I'm still in the process of completing it,, and if not also included with 'DCT' near bottom as well, then I may edit this post's wording at a later time. - Dct.Bob
Return to “Ducati Singles Main Discussions (& How to Join)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests